With JK hungover after the Eclipse Awards, Sean Boarman is an emergency pinch hitter as he and PTF go over Saturday’s Late Pick 5 at Aqueduct.
- Listen on:
- Apple Podcasts
- SoundCloud
- Spotify
- Stitcher
- OverCast
NYRA Bets Show for Saturday, January 25
Leave a Reply
1 comment
More from this show
On the new show PTF talks Saturday racing with a trio of guests. First up, Alan Studer of the Stucast is here to chat late Pick 5 at AQU...
PTF and JK are here to discuss the $91,000 carryover in Friday’s Stronach 5 carryover.
Share thisFacebookTwitterEmail
On the latest show, PTF chats about graded stakes action from WO with Drew Coatney, Aqueduct’s late Pick 5 with Matt Vagvolgyi, and Del...
JK and “The ATM” @theatm (Anthony Mattera) tackle Friday’s Stronach 5. LEG A: A: 2,7,8,9 B: 6 LEG B: A:...
On the late week show, hosted by PTF, Matt Vagvolgyi is here to talk Breeders’ Cup and Aqueduct. Drew Coatney gives his thoughts on...
Spencer guests host for Pete and goes over a difficult Stronach 5 sequence with Naomi Tukker
Share thisFacebookTwitterEmail
I am not a multirace bettor (too rich for my bankroll), but I am interested in the math and statistics of it all. Something you said on today’s show struck me. Rather than evaluating performance based on the overall outcome of multirace betting (too much variance), wouldn’t the horseplayer be better off keeping track of the outcome of the invidual races in a sequence and looking at how many races produced positive equity and how many did not (e.g., race not hit or favorite wins spread race)?. I’m not sure how to define positive versus negative equity (probably some comparison of the win price with the number of horses included), but once you get over that hurdle, you can start to answer some basic questions. Am I, on average, producing positive equity? If not, what is dragging down my average? Overspreading? Too many losing singles? Betting sequences with too many spread races? Just food for thought as you approach a deeper dive into multirace betting.