With JK hungover after the Eclipse Awards, Sean Boarman is an emergency pinch hitter as he and PTF go over Saturday’s Late Pick 5 at Aqueduct.
With JK hungover after the Eclipse Awards, Sean Boarman is an emergency pinch hitter as he and PTF go over Saturday’s Late Pick 5 at Aqueduct.
This edition of the In The Money Media Players’ Podcast late-week show kicks off with a look at horse racing stakes action from...
Churchill Downs Friday Late Pick 4 Preview | Presented by KTDF Get ready for Friday racing at Churchill Downs with In The Money Media...
In The Money Media’s Peter Thomas Fornatale (PTF) is joined by contest player Dave Nichols to preview some of the horse racing action...
Assiniboia Downs Late Pick 4 Preview – Wednesday, September 9 | In The Money Media Get ready for another exciting night of racing at...
In The Money Media’s Peter Thomas Fornatale (PTF) and Jonathon Kinchen (JK) sit to analyze the horse racing action for closing day of...
In The Money Media’s Peter Thomas Fornatale (PTF) sits with Total Performance Data’s Adam Mills to look over this past...
I am not a multirace bettor (too rich for my bankroll), but I am interested in the math and statistics of it all. Something you said on today’s show struck me. Rather than evaluating performance based on the overall outcome of multirace betting (too much variance), wouldn’t the horseplayer be better off keeping track of the outcome of the invidual races in a sequence and looking at how many races produced positive equity and how many did not (e.g., race not hit or favorite wins spread race)?. I’m not sure how to define positive versus negative equity (probably some comparison of the win price with the number of horses included), but once you get over that hurdle, you can start to answer some basic questions. Am I, on average, producing positive equity? If not, what is dragging down my average? Overspreading? Too many losing singles? Betting sequences with too many spread races? Just food for thought as you approach a deeper dive into multirace betting.